But Brian's post asks how we begin to understand the film as film. I'd suggest a few areas that fascinated me watching Three Caballeros. First, abstraction. Disney films of this period could often veer away from representation proper into a play with visual and aural elements. And its approach to representation in general showed a visual inventiveness. My favorite moments tended to be the most purely abstract ones:
Second, the blend of live action and animation. Normally, I'm not a fan of the blend (maybe bad 70s examples soured me as a child), but I loved the interplay between the two spaces here. Shadows, for instance, could reflect from real objects onto drawn ones...
... and in the process make the three-dimensional live-action person look flat and unreal. Or, shadows could be cast from the animated characters onto a live action space...
... and in the process make the three-dimensional live-action person look flat and unreal. Or, shadows could be cast from the animated characters onto a live action space...
Finally, I was interested in the film's use of optical printing. For instance, there are several moments of freeze frame:
But particularly striking are the rain-wipes that create dazzling watercolor-y effects.
These effects interest me because they show a greater Hollywood lexicon of effects in the mid-40s, but also because they take effects with fairly conventionalized use in live-action films and give them a different function in the animated film, either more playful or more expressive.
3 comments:
I too loved the totally abstract moments.
Thanks for this post. It might send me back into the phantasmagoria one more time!
Thanks, Chris, for this post. I was initially anxious about my choice of this film, as I wonder if the Disney pedigree might impede folks taking it on. And, I agree, the ideological clarity of the narrative makes it pretty clearly an animated ode to the Monroe Doctrine. But I find whenever I watch the film from front to back (rather than excerpting the most ideologically illustrative narrative bits), the film folds in surprising ways -- largely due to the extent of the "visual play" going on. But I also find I am unabashed in my love for some of the more surreal (the male dancers transmogrified into battling roosters) and expressionistic (the watercolor blurs you mention) moments...
A fascinating blog..thanks for sharing..a blof from where lot to learn..if you can visit my blog..
Post a Comment